Interiorism

Interiorism in Theology of Religions

Interiorism in theology of religions, a term coined to describe an alternative to exclusivism, inclusivism and pluralism, is a way of establishing the theological relationship of the Christian message with non-Christian religions, which goes beyond these usual models. The author of this article grasps the canonical relationship between the two biblical Testaments as a theological paradigm to define the relationship of Christian religion with the other religions. Interiorism can avoid an attitude of superiority of Christian religion towards the other religions (e.g. exclusivism, inclusivism), as well as a relativization of the Christian truth-claims (pluralism). Christian interiorism thus recognizes other religions to be not only depositaries of a partial or relative truth, but also of an insuperable truth. His methodological starting point is a radical problematization of the concept of divine revelation due to the philosophical understanding according to which the ontological relation between the creation and God is merely unilateral (St. Thomas Aquinas, Peter Knauer). Christian religion provides an answer for this fundamental problem through its Trinitarian concept of God. Only through the latter a real relationship between God and the world can be thought about without running into a contradiction. In this way the concept of “Word of God” reveals its understandable sense turning the message of Israel’s Holy Scriptures universally understandable as Old Testament. This hermeneutical relation between the biblical Testaments can be – mutatis mutandis – extended to other religions. The present work highlights this and other assumptions of theological interiorism. It eventually enters into the debate about critical objections concerning the Jewish-Christian relationship, which accuse interiorism of not respecting the uniqueness of this relationship. This article indeed aims to emphasize that the uniqueness of the Jewish-Christian relationship consists precisely in indicating the right way to relate ourselves to the other religions. (Gäde Gerhard. Interiorism in Theology of Religions and the Jewish-Christian Relationship

References

GERHARD GÄDE, DER RELIGIONSTHEOLOGISCHE INTERIORISMUS UND DAS JÜDISCH-CHRISTLICHE VERHÄLTNIS. ROCZNIKI TEOLOGICZNE Tom LXI, zeszyt 9 — 2014.

Childs B.S.: Die Theologie der einen Bibel 2, Freiburg 1996.

Gäde G.: Christus in den Religionen. Der christliche Glaube und die Wahrheit der Religionen, Paderborn 22010.

Gäde G.: Interiorismus – ein Vorschlag für einen Ausweg aus der religionstheologischen Sackgasse, in: ThG 46(2003) 14-27 [polnisch: Interioryzm – propozycja wyjścia z religijno-teologicznej ślepej uliczki, in: „Studia Oecumenica” 7(2007) 217-234].

Gäde G.: Islam in christlicher Perspektive. Den muslimischen Glauben verstehen, Paderborn 2009.

Geffré C.: Croire et interpréter. Le tournant herméneutique de la théologie, Paris 2001.

Höhn H.-J.: Gott – Offenbarung – Heilswege. Fundamentaltheologie, Würzburg 2011.

Knauer P.: Der Glaube kommt vom Hören. Ökumenische Fundamentaltheologie, Freiburg 61991.

Knauer P.: Christus in den Religionen– Interiorismus, Dialog, Pluralismus, in: Polykarp Ulin Agan SVD (Hg.), Pluralistische Religionstheologie und Mission, Nettetal 2011, 81-106.

Rahner K.: Das Christentum und die nichtchristlichen Religionen, in: Schriften zur Theologie 5, Einsiedeln 21964, 136-158.

Rahner K.: Jesus Christus in den nichtchristlichen Religionen, in: Schriften zur Theologie 12, Einsiedeln 1975, 370-383.

Rutishauser Ch.M.: Jewish-Christian Dialogue and the Theology of Religions, in: „Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations”, hg. V. Center for Christian-Jewish Learning at Boston College, vol. 1(2005-2006) 53-66.

Wohlmuth J.: Das exzeptionelle Verhältnis von Judentum und Christentum und der interreligiöse Dialog, in: J. Rahner, M. Schambeck (Hgg.), Zwischen Integration und Ausgrenzung. Migration, religiöse Identität(en) und Bildung – theologisch reflektiert, Bamberger Theologisches Forum 13, Münster 2011, 139-156.

Marshal Bruce D. Trinity and Truth. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Robert Deinhammer. The Christian Faith in Dialogue with other Religions: Towards an “Interioristic” Theology of Religions.

Aquinas, Summa Theologiae http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/sth1003.html


Bernhard, Reinhold, Ende des Dialogs?: Die Begegnung der Religionen und ihre theologische Reflexion (Zürich: TVZ, 2005)


Declaration on the Relation of the Church with Non-Christian Religions Nostra Aetate [accessed 15/4/2014]


Decree on Ecumenism Unitatis Redintegratio [accessed 15/4/2014]


Dogmatic Constitution of the Church Lumen Gentium [accessed 15/04/2014]


Dupuis, Jacques, Toward a Christian Theology of Religious Pluralism (Maryknoll/New York: Orbis Books, 1997)


Fredericks, James L., Faith among Faiths: Christian Theology and Non-Christian Religions (Mahwah [NJ]: Paulist Press, 1999)


Gerhard Gäde, Islam in christlicher Perspektive: Den muslimischen Glauben verstehen (Paderborn: Schöningh, 2009)


─, Christus in den Religionen: Der christliche Glaube und die Wahrheit der Religionen, 2nd edn (Paderborn: Schöningh, 2010)


Hick, John, An Interpretation of Religion: Human Answers to the Transcendent, 2nd edn (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).


Knauer, Peter, ‘Christus in den Religionen: Interiorismus’, Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie, 51 (2004), 237-252


Plantinga, Alvin, ‘A Defense of Religious Exclusivism’, in Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology, ed. by Louis Pojman and Michael Rea, 6th edn (Boston: Cenage Learning, 2011), pp. 640-654


Roddey, Thomas, Das Verhältnis der Kirche zu den nichtchristlichen Religionen: Die Erklärung »Nostra Aetate« des Zweiten Vatikanischen Konzils und ihre Rezeption durch das kirchliche Lehramt (Paderborn: Schöningh, 2005)


Race, Alan, Christians and Religious Pluralism: Patterns in the Christian Theology of Religions (London: SCM Press, 1983)


Rowe, William L., ‘Religious pluralism’, Religious Studies, 35 (1999), 139-150


Vajda, G., ‘Ibn Dirham‘, Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, ed by P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W. P. Heinrichs (Brill Online) http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-2/ibn-dirham-SIM_3130 [accessed 18/04/2014]

Christian Krokus, The Theology of Louis Massignon: Islam, Christ, and the Church. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2017.


Martin Nguyen. The Theology of Louis Massignon: Islam, Christ, and the Church by Christian Krokus (review). Journal of Ecumenical Studies, Volume 54, Number 4, Fall 2019, pp. 619-620 (Review)

Denisa Červenková. Gäde’s problematization of the concept of revelation as an epistemological criterion of the theology of religions 2007

Salamone, F. (2015) ‘La fede nel Dio uni-trino in dialogo interreligioso. Per un’ermeneutica trinitaria del pluralismo religioso’, Ho Theològos, 33(1/2), pp. 31–50: Interreligious dialogue is natural to the Christian vocation and has its origin, model and end in the mystery of the Trinity. In comparison with different religious experiences, the Christian faith in the Trinity, paradoxically, can offer a basic theory for their mutual dialogue, understanding and coming together. The reflections of many contemporary authors suggest the reformulation, in a Trinitarian-relational key, of the so-called inclusivist theory which does not pay attention to the theme of alterity. Rather, Christic relationality, conceived in terms of interiorism, assumption and recapitulationexpresses the dimension of absoluteness which does not suppress the particular and the singular but, on the contrary, esteems it. The distinction between theanthropological referent and thetheological referent of every religious experience gives further clarification of how Christian faith in the Trinity, the particular feature of which is being in relation with other religious experiences, possesses many elements in common with them by virtue of which a profitable interreligiousdialogue is possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Wetzel, James. “Augustine’s Love of Wisdom: An Introspective Philosophy.” The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 47, no. 1, 1993, p. 136+

%d bloggers like this: